<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet title="XSL formatting" type="text/xsl" href="http://blog.free765.eu/feed/rss2/xslt" ?><rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>Free July 6, 2005, Europa.  - Comments</title>
  <link>http://blog.free765.eu/</link>
  <atom:link href="http://blog.free765.eu/feed/rss2/comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description></description>
  <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:16:34 +0300</pubDate>
  <copyright></copyright>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Dotclear</generator>
  
    
    
    <item>
    <title>Free July 6, 2005, Europa. - christophe</title>
    <link>http://blog.free765.eu/post/2007/05/27/July-6-2005#c8228204</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:aa1cf3caf62754b4b68a281531fb0286</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:39:24 +0200</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>christophe</dc:creator>
    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;I am not so sure that free765.eu is wrong, because even if it is a US-style
date convention, it is nicer to say. If you were to say free567.eu or the
free675, this would be difficult for people to remember. Maybe we could run a
poll on which of this forms is best? Personally i would prefer
freesoftwarepatents.com, the name is simple.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyhow, kudos to Eric for this blog, it is great fun.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </item>
      
    
    <item>
    <title>Free July 6, 2005, Europa. - gerald</title>
    <link>http://blog.free765.eu/post/2007/05/27/July-6-2005#c8226901</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:aac139e14ae9ca9f53bfbd0fff6006c0</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:44:58 +0200</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gerald</dc:creator>
    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Surely it should be free675, since this is a European event and the European
date style is day-month-year. free765 uses US-style dates (month-day-year).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So the question is: why is this blog promoting US date standards? The ISO
standard is year-month-day, so it should be free576 in fact.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </item>
      
    
    <item>
    <title>Free July 6, 2005, Europa. - Ricardo Cristof Remmert-Fontes</title>
    <link>http://blog.free765.eu/post/2007/05/27/July-6-2005#c1257345</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:54bf34b2cb07e62922287ac9a036dbd8</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:45:21 +0200</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ricardo Cristof Remmert-Fontes</dc:creator>
    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Erik!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ah, now I understand the name of your blog... :-D&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards from Berlin/Germany!&lt;br /&gt;
Cristof&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Arbeitskreis Vorratsdatenspeicherung - Working group on data retention)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </item>
      
</channel>
</rss>